About this policy
LCD Information
Document Information
Source LCD ID
N/A
LCD ID
L34171
Original ICD-9 LCD ID
Not Applicable
LCD Title
Nasal Punctum-Nasolacrimal Duct Dilation and Probing with or without Irrigation
Proposed LCD in Comment Period
N/A
Source Proposed LCD
N/A
Original Effective Date
For services performed on or after 10/01/2015
Revision Effective Date
For services performed on or after 05/28/2026
Revision Ending Date
N/A
Retirement Date
N/A
Notice Period Start Date
N/A
Notice Period End Date
N/A
CPT codes, descriptions, and other data only are copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or not contained herein. CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.
Current Dental Terminology © 2025 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2026, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission.
No portion of the AHA copyrighted materials contained within this publication may be
copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the UB‐04 codes and
descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service, solution, or derivative work
without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA materials, please contact the AHA at ub04@aha.org or 312‐422‐3366.
Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for internal purposes,
resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions;
and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04 Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only
authorized with an express license from the American Hospital Association.
The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or
accuracy of any information contained in this material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the
preparation of this material, or the analysis of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions
presented in the material do not necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are
not endorsed by the AHA or any of its affiliates.
Issue
Issue Description
Limited coverage for nasal punctum as outlined in coverage and indications section.
Issue - Explanation of Change Between Proposed LCD and Final LCD
CMS National Coverage Policy
Language quoted from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) and coverage provisions in interpretive manuals is italicized throughout the policy. NCDs and coverage provisions in interpretive manuals are not subject to the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) Review Process (42 CFR 405.860[b] and 42 CFR 426 [Subpart D]). In addition, an administrative law judge may not review an NCD. See Section 1869(f)(1)(A)(i) of the Social Security Act.Unless otherwise specified, italicized text represents quotation from one or more of the following CMS sources:Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (SSA):Section 1862(a)(1)(A) excludes expenses incurred for items or services which are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member.Section 1833(e) prohibits Medicare payment for any claim which lacks the necessary information to process the claim.
Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity
Abstract:Dilation of nasolacrimal punctum and probing of nasolacrimal duct, with or without irrigation are useful treatments when mechanical, inflammatory or infectious processes cause or contribute to obstruction of normal tear drainage resulting in epiphora (excess tearing) or persistent infection.The most common cause of obstruction in adults is primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Epiphora (excess tearing) is the most common symptom of obstruction of the nasolacrimal system. Tear duct obstruction in adults can occur at any point in the nasolacrimal system including the punctum, nasolacrimal sac, and nasolacrimal duct. Obstruction most commonly occurs in the puncta or nasolacrimal duct and sac. Disease of the canalicular system is less common.It is important to differentiate between chronic epiphora, acute epiphora, and normal tearing. Chronic epiphora results from a persistent or continuous disorder and usually presents a more challenging clinical problem. Acute epiphora usually results from irritative ocular conditions such as corneal foreign bodies, allergic conjunctivitis, environmental factors such as wind, pollen, eyestrain, emotional stress, and sleep deprivation. One of the most common causes of excess tearing in older adults is dry eye syndrome. Acute epiphora usually resolves with treatment of the associated disorder and may not require dilation or probing.Before dilation and/or probing are performed, pre-punctal disturbances of ocular surface tear flow such as lid malposition and non-obstructive causes (allergy, dry eye, blepharitis, etc.) should be excluded. Tear production measurement (Schirmer test), and tear break-up time (TBUT) can indicate insufficiency or instability of tears, which can cause or contribute to epiphora. Dye disappearance testing (sodium fluorescein), Jones dye testing or saccharine testing can be used to exclude significant obstruction and/or help identify the site and degree of obstruction.If after the history, physical examination (including slit lamp), and other appropriate non-invasive tests have been completed, the site of obstruction is suspected to be at or distal to the punctum, dilation may proceed. Local anesthetic is instilled, and then the punctum is gradually dilated using probes of increasing size. If simple dilation fails to establish patency, lacrimal probing may be performed by passing a malleable wire probe through the punctum, into the canaliculus, lacrimal sac and down the nasolacrimal duct until patency is established. Irrigation may be used during both dilation and probing.For patients in whom nasolacrimal duct probing has failed, further surgical treatment is available.Punctal dilation and lacrimal duct probing is contraindicated in the following circumstances:
Anatomic malformations in the lacrimal duct or bony lacrimal canal;
Recurrent episodes of active dacryocystitis;
Post-traumatic strictures with bony narrowing;
Tumor of the lacrimal sac.
For procedural illustration for probing of nasolacrimal duct, please refer to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 2021, pg 502. Indications:Nasolacrimal punctal dilation and nasolacrimal duct probing may be reasonable and necessary when obstruction at or distal to the lacrimal puncta is reasonably suspected to be causing or contributing to the patient's symptoms (usually excessive tearing (epiphora) or chronic dacryocystitis), and when such measures are required to alleviate the patient's symptoms and reduce the likelihood of infection or damage to the lacrimal drainage apparatus.Probing of the nasolacrimal duct and/or dilation of the nasolacrimal punctum can be carried out for any of the following indications:
Epiphora (excessive tearing) due to acquired obstruction within the nasolacrimal sac and duct;
A mucocele of the lacrimal sac;
Chronic dacryocystitis or conjunctivitis due to lacrimal sac obstruction;
Lacrimal sac infection that must be relieved before intra-ocular surgery.
Limitations:
Payment for these procedures for treatment of epiphora is limited to patients whose medical records indicate they have first undergone a thorough lacrimal evaluation that includes at least the following:
Consideration by history and physical examination (including slit lamp), of likely pre-punctal and/or non-obstructive causes for epiphora such as disturbances of ocular surface tear flow by lid malposition, allergy, dry eye, blepharitis; and
Non-invasive testing to diagnose punctal or post-punctal obstruction and to identify the site and degree of obstruction, such as by using dye disappearance testing when appropriate; followed by
Initiation of appropriate treatment.
Separate reimbursement for tear production measurement (Schirmer test), tear break-up time (TBUT), dye disappearance testing (sodium fluorescein), Jones dye testing or saccharine testing is not available. These are considered part of a general opthalmological examination or E&M service.
Punctal dilation and lacrimal duct probing are not indicated for dacryocystolithiasis.
Provision of any of these services is subject to state regulations, and individual providers’ scopes of practice.
Summary of Evidence
N/A
Analysis of Evidence (Rationale for Determination)
N/A
Coverage indications
Abstract: Dilation of nasolacrimal punctum and probing of nasolacrimal duct, with or without irrigation are useful treatments when mechanical, inflammatory or infectious processes cause or contribute to obstruction of normal tear drainage resulting in epiphora (excess tearing) or persistent infection. The most common cause of obstruction in adults is primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Epiphora (excess tearing) is the most common symptom of obstruction of the nasolacrimal system. Tear duct obstruction in adults can occur at any point in the nasolacrimal system including the punctum, nasolacrimal sac, and nasolacrimal duct. Obstruction most commonly occurs in the puncta or nasolacrimal duct and sac. Disease of the canalicular system is less common. It is important to differentiate between chronic epiphora, acute epiphora, and normal tearing. Chronic epiphora results from a persistent or continuous disorder and usually presents a more challenging clinical problem. Acute epiphora usually results from irritative ocular conditions such as corneal foreign bodies, allergic conjunctivitis, environmental factors such as wind, pollen, eyestrain, emotional stress, and sleep deprivation. One of the most common causes of excess tearing in older adults is dry eye syndrome. Acute epiphora usually resolves with treatment of the associated disorder and may not require dilation or probing. Before dilation and/or probing are performed, pre-punctal disturbances of ocular surface tear flow such as lid malposition and non-obstructive causes (allergy, dry eye, blepharitis, etc.) should be excluded. Tear production measurement (Schirmer test), and tear break-up time (TBUT) can indicate insufficiency or instability of tears, which can cause or contribute to epiphora. Dye disappearance testing (sodium fluorescein), Jones dye testing or saccharine testing can be used to exclude significant obstruction and/or help identify the site and degree of obstruction. If after the history, physical examination (including slit lamp), and other appropriate non-invasive tests have been completed, the site of obstruction is suspected to be at or distal to the punctum, dilation may proceed. Local anesthetic is instilled, and then the punctum is gradually dilated using probes of increasing size. If simple dilation fails to establish patency, lacrimal probing may be performed by passing a malleable wire probe through the punctum, into the canaliculus, lacrimal sac and down the nasolacrimal duct until patency is established. Irrigation may be used during both dilation and probing. For patients in whom nasolacrimal duct probing has failed, further surgical treatment is available. Punctal dilation and lacrimal duct probing is contraindicated in the following circumstances: Anatomic malformations in the lacrimal duct or bony lacrimal canal; Recurrent episodes of active dacryocystitis; Post-traumatic strictures with bony narrowing; Tumor of the lacrimal sac. For procedural illustration for probing of nasolacrimal duct, please refer to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 2021, pg 502. Indications: Nasolacrimal punctal dilation and nasolacrimal duct probing may be reasonable and necessary when obstruction at or distal to the lacrimal puncta is reasonably suspected to be causing or contributing to the patient's symptoms (usually excessive tearing (epiphora) or chronic dacryocystitis), and when such measures are required to alleviate the patient's symptoms and reduce the likelihood of infection or damage to the lacrimal drainage apparatus. Probing of the nasolacrimal duct and/or dilation of the nasolacrimal punctum can be carried out for any of the following indications: Epiphora (excessive tearing) due to acquired obstruction within the nasolacrimal sac and duct; A mucocele of the lacrimal sac; Chronic dacryocystitis or conjunctivitis due to lacrimal sac obstruction; Lacrimal sac infection that must be relieved before intra-ocular surgery. Limitations: Payment for these procedures for treatment of epiphora is limited to patients whose medical records indicate they have first undergone a thorough lacrimal evaluation that includes at least the following: Consideration by history and physical examination (including slit lamp), of likely pre-punctal and/or non-obstructive causes for epiphora such as disturbances of ocular surface tear flow by lid malposition, allergy, dry eye, blepharitis; and Non-invasive testing to diagnose punctal or post-punctal obstruction and to identify the site and degree of obstruction, such as by using dye disappearance testing when appropriate; followed by Initiation of appropriate treatment. Separate reimbursement for tear production measurement (Schirmer test), tear break-up time (TBUT), dye disappearance testing (sodium fluorescein), Jones dye testing or saccharine testing is not available. These are considered part of a general opthalmological examination or E&M service. Punctal dilation and lacrimal duct probing are not indicated for dacryocystolithiasis. Provision of any of these services is subject to state regulations, and individual providers’ scopes of practice.
Codes in this policy
Code numbers and each code’s status as the policy records it. CPT code descriptions are left out of this page, as are the passages that cite CPT codes; the official document has them.
Backwork has no codes on record for this policy. Check the source.